Category talk:Adventures of Syver: Difference between revisions

From Chaz Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Blotreland (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(9 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 58: Line 58:
(PS: When is the AoS game comin' out? Honest question.)
(PS: When is the AoS game comin' out? Honest question.)


THERE WAS NO CARTOON SHOW --[[User:Paxton|- Paxton, 2025]] ([[User talk:Paxton|talk]]) 13:46, 5 June 2025 (CDT) (pps: i don't know)
=Paxton's response=
 
THERE WAS NO CARTOON SHOW --[[User:Paxton|- Paxton, 2025]] ([[User talk:Paxton|talk]]) 13:46, 5 June 2025 (CDT) (PPS: i don't know)


K said he would start working on the game last year, he has since done nothing…so dont expect any news about it anytime soon -Harrison
K said he would start working on the game last year, he has since done nothing…so dont expect any news about it anytime soon -Harrison
Line 65: Line 67:


I used the term because that's what i was talking about. Maddren isn't from me. Check the "View History" tab to see who made it. I never said that Void was a syver, it's not on my user page. I'm using the term "P&S" because I'm complaining about the term. You don't NEED the lore for the syvers. Chaz doesn't have any lore. The Chaomics don't have lore. Do you know how hard it is to mass upload images? VERY. If you say that Chaz isn't rectangular, and then say that you don't like Chaz's ovalness, then you have made a paradox. What are you trying to imply by the "Hmm..." after Quote 2? Chaz Wiki is a wiki about multiple topics, not 1 single topic you call "Pengins & Syvers". Stop worrying about the Lore. --[[User:Paxton|- Paxton, 2025]] ([[User talk:Paxton|talk]]) 14:01, 5 June 2025 (CDT)
I used the term because that's what i was talking about. Maddren isn't from me. Check the "View History" tab to see who made it. I never said that Void was a syver, it's not on my user page. I'm using the term "P&S" because I'm complaining about the term. You don't NEED the lore for the syvers. Chaz doesn't have any lore. The Chaomics don't have lore. Do you know how hard it is to mass upload images? VERY. If you say that Chaz isn't rectangular, and then say that you don't like Chaz's ovalness, then you have made a paradox. What are you trying to imply by the "Hmm..." after Quote 2? Chaz Wiki is a wiki about multiple topics, not 1 single topic you call "Pengins & Syvers". Stop worrying about the Lore. --[[User:Paxton|- Paxton, 2025]] ([[User talk:Paxton|talk]]) 14:01, 5 June 2025 (CDT)
=Alonzo's response=
I REALLY DON'T CARE, AND NEITHER DO YOU!
lol k
:1. "I used the term because that's what i was talking about" means the collective name exists.
:2. Maddren exists in said show because I will make a Maddren Chaz Cartoon.
:3. Not you, I said that Void was on Harrison's user page. Where did you get that ''you'' said so, you?
:4. I don't need it, but now that it's online I would think that weirdos who want to know about it should know about it. It is public domain. (You did (possibly) agree with me on this. [[Trogdor/Copyright]])
::4.1. Oh, OK. (Chaz)
:5. "I just read more of this, oh no"
:Oh yes.
:6. "Do you know how hard it is to mass upload images?" I never implied to do so. I meant to upload images that can verify your claims and any other important ones.
:7. Sigh.
::7.1. Chaz in the Cartoons is rectangular.
::7.2. He isn't otherwise (normally).
::7.3. He is made rectangular for comedic and animation reasons.
:::7.3.1. Comedic reason: To appeal more than other pengins.
:::7.3.4. Animation reason: Same as the comedic one.
::7.4. In the context of most paradoxes, you seem to not know what one is.
::Ultimatum on designs: You really shouldn't care. You also kept changing your opinion on them.
:8. "Hmm..." = The merge did happen.
:9. Same reason as before.
:10. Same reason as number 4.
There were also many important other parts. Did you agree or disagree with them? Please note this (and the other parts) when you write.
Also: Please write your text in semi-formal, organized responses so I won't have to search for stuff in such a tedious way.
[[User:Blotreland|<span style="color:deeppink;text-decoration-color:deeppink;">'''BLOTRE'''</span>]]
"That was on '''your''' user page" that's why --[[User:Paxton|&#45; Paxton, 2025]] ([[User talk:Paxton|talk]]) 18:01, 5 June 2025 (CDT)
Can you guys just stop arguing for 5 minutes -Harrison
Yea, fine. --[[User:Paxton|&#45; Paxton, 2025]] ([[User talk:Paxton|talk]]) 18:42, 5 June 2025 (CDT)
I wasn't even trying
All right, Paxton & Harrison. I was wrong and you were right. [[User:Blotreland|<span style="color:deeppink;text-decoration-color:deeppink;">'''BLOTRE'''</span>]]
Anyways, I'm actually making a cartoon now. Here's the opening frame:
[[File:Paxtonpenguintoon.png]]
I'll crop it.
😀
One final issue: i don't own red. It should be a "PaxtonPenguin & AoS" cartoon --[[User:Paxton|&#45; Paxton, 2025]] ([[User talk:Paxton|talk]]) 14:10, 6 June 2025 (CDT)
ok [[User:Blotreland|<span style="color:deeppink;text-decoration-color:deeppink;">'''BLOTRE'''</span>]]

Latest revision as of 11:04, 7 June 2025

This will be a very long rant.

Why I did the bad things:

1. I didn't know what proboscis was. (King)
2. Why did you use the term "P&S" when it is false?
2.1. It refers to the cartoon show, which is a sort of merge for the two areas, hence the use of the collective name.
3. OH! Hold on, I never said that. That was on your user page, THAT's why I thought he was a syver. (Void)
4. I didn't think that. (M in RM)
5. I googled it. Look up stalag knight and you'll get why I put that there.
5.1. Also (unlike normal jokes), it's not funny unless you spoil it (same goes for Madderen, which is an insult to Madden. Stop being mean).
6. The Chaz Cartoons aren't canon unless if the franchise ever existed. Since you use such terms (the collective name "P&S"), it does. The Chaomics seem to be just as canon (when considered in the collective name that is P&S).

Also, we need evidence of the said information because then we can prove such alleged truths. The dumping of random Chaomics and articles will NOT help. We need historically accurate records of Pengins & Syvers (collectively speaking, this term kind of has to exist) to not only prove THESE claims, but also to solve with other claims that need to be recorded, for example, for the sake of the lore article.

For once you two, edit articles & stop just telling me about inconveniences in text as if that will fix anything. You should also upload files of images, or once and for all make the Paxton's old comics and Lego Game articles. They will show us historical value in the series. I'm also going to show some old quotes.

Quote 1:

The rectangle chaz was the dnd thing, chaz is as old as 2020. I'll need to find the first usage of chaz in one of my old comic books, but he's like 5 years old. ⚊ {{{2}}}

Chaz comes from about 2020. Also, Chaz in the Chaz Cartoons isn't rectangular for this reason. It's because his normal ovally-ness is not very appealing in my opinion.

Quote 2:

The wiki was created on Nov 4, 2023. Pengins and Syvers are two completely different things. Syvers are like almost 10 years old and i joined in on the fun in 2022/2023. Pengins are also old, but probably not as old as Syvers given how i only gave Peep a name in like 2018-2020. Just thought i should give you this info ⚊ {{{2}}}

Pengins come from about 2019, and the merge happened around mid-2022, around the time Stupid Cooking came out. Hmm...

Quote 3:

Pengins & Syvers is something only YOU made up and something only YOU use. They've never merged. YOU merged them together and are now claiming that the "Chaz Cartoons" are canon. Don't assume things, don't join random articles together, and stop messing with our pages. - You, Paxton, literally on the front page

"They've never merged" is false. Remember the last quote? There's your creation that is the CHAZ WIKI, where syver and pengin alike reside, as well as many other stupidly convoluted things as well, including the collective name of P&S itself. I also have to say it's (the Chaz Cartoons, are) canon because they are what put Pengins & Syvers together. I also have to assume things because of the fact that you guys never edit articles. Joining articles and messing with your pages for the same reason.

The answer to the very long list of problems to these awful articles would not be you, Paxton & Harrison, edited articles.

I hate to be so mean around you two. You really don't deserve it. But on the other hand...

A list of emojis that genuinely describe my emotions about this subject:

☹ 😤 😵‍💫 😾

Well, I guess it wasn't a list, but I don't care. Anyways, its my birthday lol

BLOTRE

(PS: When is the AoS game comin' out? Honest question.)

Paxton's response

THERE WAS NO CARTOON SHOW --- Paxton, 2025 (talk) 13:46, 5 June 2025 (CDT) (PPS: i don't know)

K said he would start working on the game last year, he has since done nothing…so dont expect any news about it anytime soon -Harrison

I just read more of this, oh no

I used the term because that's what i was talking about. Maddren isn't from me. Check the "View History" tab to see who made it. I never said that Void was a syver, it's not on my user page. I'm using the term "P&S" because I'm complaining about the term. You don't NEED the lore for the syvers. Chaz doesn't have any lore. The Chaomics don't have lore. Do you know how hard it is to mass upload images? VERY. If you say that Chaz isn't rectangular, and then say that you don't like Chaz's ovalness, then you have made a paradox. What are you trying to imply by the "Hmm..." after Quote 2? Chaz Wiki is a wiki about multiple topics, not 1 single topic you call "Pengins & Syvers". Stop worrying about the Lore. --- Paxton, 2025 (talk) 14:01, 5 June 2025 (CDT)

Alonzo's response

I REALLY DON'T CARE, AND NEITHER DO YOU!

lol k

1. "I used the term because that's what i was talking about" means the collective name exists.
2. Maddren exists in said show because I will make a Maddren Chaz Cartoon.
3. Not you, I said that Void was on Harrison's user page. Where did you get that you said so, you?
4. I don't need it, but now that it's online I would think that weirdos who want to know about it should know about it. It is public domain. (You did (possibly) agree with me on this. Trogdor/Copyright)
4.1. Oh, OK. (Chaz)
5. "I just read more of this, oh no"
Oh yes.
6. "Do you know how hard it is to mass upload images?" I never implied to do so. I meant to upload images that can verify your claims and any other important ones.
7. Sigh.
7.1. Chaz in the Cartoons is rectangular.
7.2. He isn't otherwise (normally).
7.3. He is made rectangular for comedic and animation reasons.
7.3.1. Comedic reason: To appeal more than other pengins.
7.3.4. Animation reason: Same as the comedic one.
7.4. In the context of most paradoxes, you seem to not know what one is.
Ultimatum on designs: You really shouldn't care. You also kept changing your opinion on them.
8. "Hmm..." = The merge did happen.
9. Same reason as before.
10. Same reason as number 4.

There were also many important other parts. Did you agree or disagree with them? Please note this (and the other parts) when you write.

Also: Please write your text in semi-formal, organized responses so I won't have to search for stuff in such a tedious way.

BLOTRE

"That was on your user page" that's why --- Paxton, 2025 (talk) 18:01, 5 June 2025 (CDT)

Can you guys just stop arguing for 5 minutes -Harrison

Yea, fine. --- Paxton, 2025 (talk) 18:42, 5 June 2025 (CDT)

I wasn't even trying

All right, Paxton & Harrison. I was wrong and you were right. BLOTRE

Anyways, I'm actually making a cartoon now. Here's the opening frame:

I'll crop it.

😀

One final issue: i don't own red. It should be a "PaxtonPenguin & AoS" cartoon --- Paxton, 2025 (talk) 14:10, 6 June 2025 (CDT)

ok BLOTRE