Blotre/Paxton: Difference between revisions

From Chaz Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
YES
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{back|Blotre}}
{{back|Blotre}}
[[File:Paxton.jpg|thumb|Him as I draw him (only once)]]
[[File:Paxton.jpg|thumb|Paxton, you know, the guy who said the a-word.]]
Instead of making a new Chaz Wiki or an encyclopedic page ''here,'' I should probably make some pages about the Chaomics, ''The Adventures of Syver!'', and my cartoon ''Pengins & Syvers'' on Incredible Barberries (see footnote<sup>1</sup>). I don't know how, but I would want to get Paxton and all the other users around there not only for so, but also in case another [[Chaz Wiki:Uphate|update goes wrong]] that breaks &or reduces the wiki. As well as just for fun. I've developed a negative relationship with him [Paxton] and nothing I seem to do works. So I feel like this will be a good apology letter to Paxton, as well as Harrison, Mikkayla, Beckett, Will and Kaspers, who all made ''AoS,'' two of them for the Chaomics, plus some stuff of his [Paxton].
I don't want to have to make "encyclopedic" <fog-horn!> articles about AoS, the Chaomics, or P&S. Considering the cartoon, character designs, articles, and copyright have been muddled due to many irregularities. I'll move them to IB (I'm giving you a link).
==Context==
The PaxtonPenguin team and their creations are, although simplistic, are too complex to compile information about them in an at least coherent way; the archives should be used. I say that maybe you [[peep]]s at PP could join (I have the link again), and we could discuss more there. But for now, I'm sorry for going past the limits of vandalization Chaz Wiki can handle, although that's essentially what it's for. Although we've gotten the mentioned out of the way, there's still the two censors I got. The first I understand, but the second I'm still confused about. The rules state "no NSFW, OK?" and that includes sexually EXPLICIT content. What I said was that you were cute in the way a baby is and that it wasn't sexual. That is notably sexually IMplicit, so why?
TL;DR: Considering the cartoon, character designs, articles, and copyright have been muddled due to many irregularities.


When I joined Chaz Wiki, I found out about Chaz, Peep and Red. So I made a cartoon, what would become ''90 Bazillion Bottles of Root Beer on the Wall'', and I uploaded it to FileGarden and linked to it here. However, Paxton removed it saying "COPYRIGHT STRIKED BY PAXTON (ME, MAKER OF CHAZ AND PEEP<sup>(kind of that)</sup>) AND HARRISON (NARRATOR OF AOS) AND KASPER, THE CREATOR OF AOS and maybe also will, but not really"<sup>2</sup>. I re-did it, considering the fact that Chaz Wiki is public domain (later on that), and it happened again. I still made the cartoons, at the time the "Chz Cartoons," (he to a considerable extent criticized and noted the ''grotesque'' designs<sup>3</sup>) and noted them to him. He's fine with the situation of what we<sup>3</sup> call ''P&S'' today, however I tried recently to make encyclopedic articles about it. And MANY issues have came. That situation has also been fixed, Paxton noting that it was mostly his fault, and otherwise the result of me connecting the dots<sup>2</sup>.
Back to the apology, I have nothing to really continue.
==Consideration==
 
The PaxtonPenguin team and their creations are, although simplistic, are too complex to compile information about them in an at least coherent way; the archives should be used. Although it may be rude, I do suggest that you guys out there at least try to find ''AoS'' shorts &or
[[User:Peter the Knatt|Blotre]] ([[User talk:Peter the Knatt|talk]]) 17:06, 12 July 2025 (CDT)

Latest revision as of 17:06, 12 July 2025

< Blotre

Paxton, you know, the guy who said the a-word.

I don't want to have to make "encyclopedic" <fog-horn!> articles about AoS, the Chaomics, or P&S. Considering the cartoon, character designs, articles, and copyright have been muddled due to many irregularities. I'll move them to IB (I'm giving you a link). The PaxtonPenguin team and their creations are, although simplistic, are too complex to compile information about them in an at least coherent way; the archives should be used. I say that maybe you peeps at PP could join (I have the link again), and we could discuss more there. But for now, I'm sorry for going past the limits of vandalization Chaz Wiki can handle, although that's essentially what it's for. Although we've gotten the mentioned out of the way, there's still the two censors I got. The first I understand, but the second I'm still confused about. The rules state "no NSFW, OK?" and that includes sexually EXPLICIT content. What I said was that you were cute in the way a baby is and that it wasn't sexual. That is notably sexually IMplicit, so why?

Back to the apology, I have nothing to really continue.

Blotre (talk) 17:06, 12 July 2025 (CDT)