Blotre/Paxton: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
YES |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{back|Blotre}} | {{back|Blotre}} | ||
[[File:Paxton.jpg|thumb| | [[File:Paxton.jpg|thumb|Paxton, you know, the guy who said the a-word.]] | ||
I don't want to have to make "encyclopedic" <fog-horn!> articles about AoS, the Chaomics, or P&S. Considering the cartoon, character designs, articles, and copyright have been muddled due to many irregularities. I'll move them to IB (I'm giving you a link). | |||
The PaxtonPenguin team and their creations are, although simplistic, are too complex to compile information about them in an at least coherent way; the archives should be used. I say that maybe you [[peep]]s at PP could join (I have the link again), and we could discuss more there. But for now, I'm sorry for going past the limits of vandalization Chaz Wiki can handle, although that's essentially what it's for. Although we've gotten the mentioned out of the way, there's still the two censors I got. The first I understand, but the second I'm still confused about. The rules state "no NSFW, OK?" and that includes sexually EXPLICIT content. What I said was that you were cute in the way a baby is and that it wasn't sexual. That is notably sexually IMplicit, so why? | |||
Back to the apology, I have nothing to really continue. | |||
[[User:Peter the Knatt|Blotre]] ([[User talk:Peter the Knatt|talk]]) 17:06, 12 July 2025 (CDT) |
Latest revision as of 17:06, 12 July 2025
< Blotre

I don't want to have to make "encyclopedic" <fog-horn!> articles about AoS, the Chaomics, or P&S. Considering the cartoon, character designs, articles, and copyright have been muddled due to many irregularities. I'll move them to IB (I'm giving you a link). The PaxtonPenguin team and their creations are, although simplistic, are too complex to compile information about them in an at least coherent way; the archives should be used. I say that maybe you peeps at PP could join (I have the link again), and we could discuss more there. But for now, I'm sorry for going past the limits of vandalization Chaz Wiki can handle, although that's essentially what it's for. Although we've gotten the mentioned out of the way, there's still the two censors I got. The first I understand, but the second I'm still confused about. The rules state "no NSFW, OK?" and that includes sexually EXPLICIT content. What I said was that you were cute in the way a baby is and that it wasn't sexual. That is notably sexually IMplicit, so why?
Back to the apology, I have nothing to really continue.